Thursday, July 30. 2009
The Wall Street Journal is running a fascinating opinion piece about the possible impact of new gTLDs and IDNs. Author L. Gordon Crovitz posits that multiplying TLDs and languages on the Net may make it easier for authoritarian governments to attempt to stifle free-speech and meddle in what the article says is currently a "happy state of affairs" in which "one of the marvels of the Internet is that it is self-governing, with private groups of engineers and technology companies doing their best to keep it up and running without political interference."
I fully agree with what I think is a very good summary of why the ICANN system of governance suits the Internet to a tee. Lets not forget, after all, that both ICANN and the Internet are forays into what only a few years ago was just unknown territory. I think it's safe to say there's never been a medium like the Internet, and there's never been a body of governance like ICANN. Think what went before and you're bound to get the point: telex, print newspapers, cassette tapes and VHS for the Internet… the UN for ICANN.
So although the WSJ article seems right on the money when it describes a pioneering model of governance which shields the Internet from the ravages of too much government intervention, I'm not sure I get the link being made to new TLDs and IDNs. ICANN, says the WSJ, "plans to open the door to many new Web addresses and to give better access to non-English-language users." This, we are told, "could result in authoritarian governments insisting on more influence."
Continue reading "Do new TLDs and IDNs mean tighter government control?"
Tuesday, July 28. 2009
That's the service on offer from YourSiteCan.BE. The site sports a search box designed to allow any combination of a domain name and a TLD to be queried. If the query returns an "available", then you may elect to pay $8.99.
What are you buying? Not the domain name of course, since no new TLDs have been launched yet. Just the right for the requested domain not to be listed as "available" any longer on this specific website. Yes, that's right, for your 9 bucks you get the privilege of blocking a fictitious domain name from being listed on YourSiteCan.BE!
Customers will also be informed when (or if) the new TLD they have searched becomes available. This so they can come back to YourSiteCan.BE and pay extra, should they want to actually register the name.
Reading the site's FAQ, they make no false claims. They do not claim to be registering domains. They do mention that if the domain being searched for does become available one day, they may not be able to register it.
So in reality, they are not doing anything untoward. Just selling a blocking service on their own site, and information on the launch of new TLDs that is bound to be available from a multitude of sources once it does happen. Amazing the kind of business ideas that new TLDs are generating…
Monday, July 27. 2009
In a recent article on the proposed expansion of the Internet through the creation of new Top Level Domains, Forbes.com paints a balanced picture of what this could mean for the future of the web.
It's nice to see the "mainstream media" taking a positive look at the wealth of opportunities new TLDs might open up. Of course, concerns such as cost and the protection of intellectual property rights are also part of the article, as they should be.
But with an intro which talks about the dot-com era giving way to the world of the dot-brand, Forbes clearly understands what could be at stake here. "What does that mean?" asks author Laurie Burkitt. "Houston's police department can drop its clunky Web address, www.houstontx.gov/police/index, and switch to police.houston."
Exactly.
The Forbes piece does raise one worry with me however. ICANN VP Paul Levins is quoted as saying "It's likely that companies may band together to form domain groups (…) cellular phone companies may police the ".mobile" name."
I sure hope that's a misquote. If not, the guys at .MOBI may not take too kindly to a senior member of the ICANN staff listing as an example of a possible new gTLD a domain so close to their own…
Thursday, July 23. 2009
Today (July 23rd), sports car manufacturer Porsche announced it is dismissing its star CEO Wendelin Wiedeking with immediate effect.
Why am I talking about this? This has nothing to do with domain names, does it? True, but although my blog may be domain centric, it is first and foremost the blog of an entrepreneur. And this Porsche story is fascinating for anyone interested in the world of business.
What has my interest so spiked? The lightning fast way in which fortunes can turn around in business. A year ago, Porsche was hailed as a modern miracle. Although a producer of niche sports cars in the premium segment, it was the most profitable carmaker in the world. Period. And yet, when Wiedeking became CEO on October 1, 1992, Porsche was on its last legs.
The miracle turnaround Wiedeking orchestrated reached its pinnacle with the attempted takeover of Volkswagen. In classic David vs Goliath style, tiny Porsche was about to buy one of the biggest automakers in the world.
Then the recession hit and it all went south. Crippled by the debt (in excess of 9 billion euros) that it had run to buy a large enough holding in VW to be able to take control, Porsche went from very top to rock bottom in a matter of weeks. Today, it looks almost certain to be bailed out by VW, set to pay off the largest portion of Porsche's debt and acquire the company in the process.
Wiedeking, considered a few years ago the auto industry's golden man, is now on the dole. Oh don't worry about him, he was the highest paid executive in the industry and he leaves Porsche with 50 millions euros in "severance pay".
But there are lessons to be learned from this. There's an obvious one that all entrepreneurs know only too well. Even when things are going extremely well, disaster may never be far away so you need to adjust your strategy to suit.
I take away a more personal lesson as well: be passionate and knowledgeable about the product you sell. It's not that Wiedeking could have anticipated the recession, but maybe just concentrating on Porsche's core business instead of becoming more trust fund than sports car maker would have helped (just before the downfall, Porsche was making more money from dealing in VW shares than it was from selling cars). No-one will be surprised to learn that Wiedeking, undoubtedly a brilliant CEO, is said to not even like cars! Therein may lie the root of Porsche's problems…
Tuesday, July 21. 2009
This is an interesting one. Official UDRP provider NAF has just settled with the Minnesota Attorney General's office after being sued by them for deceptive practices. Under the terms of the settlement, NAF has agreed to stop handling any credit disputes from July 24th.
Reading from the Attorney General's press release, it appears NAF "misrepresented its independence and hid from consumers and the public its extensive ties to the collection industry."
Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson added: "The company tells consumers, the public, courts, and the government that it is independent and operates like an impartial court system. In fact, it has extensive ties to the collection industry—ties that it hides from the public."
So should this case have any impact on NAF's domain name business and status as an official ICANN dispute resolution centre?
Thursday, July 9. 2009
NASK, the entity in charge of Poland's .PL Internet suffix, has reportedly lost up to 14 millions zloty (around 3.2 million euros) on failed FOREX futures investment.
The polish press is reporting this as a potential case of fraud. NASK is a public entity and is therefore seen to have invested – and lost – taxpayers' money. NASK is said to have an annual budget of around 70 million zloty (approx 16 million euros).
NASK director Maciej Kozłowski was fired over the growing scandal by Science and Higher Education Minister Barbara Kudrycka. Former NASK Research Director Krzysztof Malinowski took over as Director on July 1st 2009.
Tuesday, July 7. 2009
During last month's Sydney ICANN meeting, INDOM became the first French registrar to sign the new RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement). The RAA is the contract binding ICANN and its official registrars.
The current RAA goes back to the creation of ICANN in 1998, was last updated in 2001, and is now clearly outdated. The various stakeholders within the GNSO (Generic Names Supporting Organisation – ICANN's policy-making body for generic Top Level Domains) have long wanted to bring consumers enhanced protection as part of a revamped RAA.
After lengthy negotiations within the community, the GNSO Council (of which I am a member), voted in favour of the new RAA last March during the Mexico ICANN meeting. The RAA was subsequently given a green light by the ICANN Board.
The new RAA toughens registrar requirements for compliance and clear business practices. It is a stronger enforcement tool for ICANN to ensure consumers are treated fairly and registrars reach the high standards ICANN now comes to expect of those companies it accredits.
A handpicked number of registrars were selected by ICANN to be part of the inaugural signing ceremony for the new RAA in Sydney. The only company in France to be asked was INDOM. "Together, the signatories represent about 50 percent of the 110 million generic top-level domains registered on the Internet," says ICANN in its official press release.
INDOM is proud to be amongst those flagship registrars working to bring an even higher level of service to domain name registrants the world over.
Thursday, July 2. 2009
.COM registry Verisign is planning a more robust authentication service to prevent accidental or abuse modifications to domain names. The company is billing this as part of a domain name security enhancement program, the idea being to help registrars protect their customers' accounts.
The service would impact both registry/registrar and registrar/registrant transactions. Verisign plans to add dynamic passcodes to current username/password combinations to ensure that accessing potential key domain name management functions requires more than a standard level of authentication.
The service is currently awaiting ICANN approval as part of the Registry Services Evaluation Process and would apply to both .COM and .NET.
|